<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice Society of America &#8211; Kingdom Come Special: Magog #1 &#8211; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/11/20/justice-society-of-america-kingdom-come-special-magog-1-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/11/20/justice-society-of-america-kingdom-come-special-magog-1-review/</link>
	<description>Weekly Comic Book Review is an online magazine dedicated to providing readers comic book and graphic novel reviews, and commentary on the comic book culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deamentia</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/11/20/justice-society-of-america-kingdom-come-special-magog-1-review/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deamentia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wcbr.wordpress.com/?p=2957#comment-1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your logic is flawed. I&#039;m the reviewer, and I&#039;m telling you how it read to me. Also, if what you said is true, why make this a &quot;#1&quot; issue? Why mislead people into buying this issue if they can&#039;t follow along. This is, after all, a stand alone issue. That&#039;s why the book got a lower grade. I don&#039;t blame Tomasi - I blame DC editorial and marketing for making a decision to mislead potential readers into a quagmire of a story. The $3.99 price point doesn&#039;t help the grade, either (more pages or not).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your logic is flawed. I&#8217;m the reviewer, and I&#8217;m telling you how it read to me. Also, if what you said is true, why make this a &#8220;#1&#8243; issue? Why mislead people into buying this issue if they can&#8217;t follow along. This is, after all, a stand alone issue. That&#8217;s why the book got a lower grade. I don&#8217;t blame Tomasi &#8211; I blame DC editorial and marketing for making a decision to mislead potential readers into a quagmire of a story. The $3.99 price point doesn&#8217;t help the grade, either (more pages or not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackAdley</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/11/20/justice-society-of-america-kingdom-come-special-magog-1-review/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BlackAdley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wcbr.wordpress.com/?p=2957#comment-1788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a comic that is written explicitly as a part of a continuous story, especially the rich, episodic, sequential continuity of the JSA, it would probably be best to approach a review from that perspective.  I don&#039;t think this comic, or most DC comics for that matter, claims to be a good &quot;jumping on point.&quot;  If you&#039;re not current with JSA, is pretty much invalidates your review.

Imagine reviewing a random issue of, say, Avengers : The Initiative, without reading the last 5 or 6.  Wouldn&#039;t make much sense, since that series also does not claim to be anything but a very sequential story.  Having to read every issue is pretty much an inherent expectation of such titles. Poor review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a comic that is written explicitly as a part of a continuous story, especially the rich, episodic, sequential continuity of the JSA, it would probably be best to approach a review from that perspective.  I don&#8217;t think this comic, or most DC comics for that matter, claims to be a good &#8220;jumping on point.&#8221;  If you&#8217;re not current with JSA, is pretty much invalidates your review.</p>
<p>Imagine reviewing a random issue of, say, Avengers : The Initiative, without reading the last 5 or 6.  Wouldn&#8217;t make much sense, since that series also does not claim to be anything but a very sequential story.  Having to read every issue is pretty much an inherent expectation of such titles. Poor review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

