<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCBR Quick Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/12/09/wcbr-quick-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/12/09/wcbr-quick-reviews/</link>
	<description>Weekly Comic Book Review is an online magazine dedicated to providing readers comic book and graphic novel reviews, and commentary on the comic book culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/12/09/wcbr-quick-reviews/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=3430#comment-1877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to be fair, the best review I could give HT was a c, because honestly, I would normally give it a D, because it was just there, doing nothing further than its concept, but a c, because I think it COULD be good.  Like a really bad pilot episode.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be fair, the best review I could give HT was a c, because honestly, I would normally give it a D, because it was just there, doing nothing further than its concept, but a c, because I think it COULD be good.  Like a really bad pilot episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2008/12/09/wcbr-quick-reviews/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=3430#comment-1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eye of the camera gets a c, but Haunted Tank gets an A.

This very interesting, because I would have given EotC at least a B.  I think your reaction has to do with your preconception that only Ross could do this.  I think you should take another look and judge this book on its own merits.  

Now Haunted Tank, I don&#039;t get it.  Maybe im the crazy one, but it was just a concept.  It was a neat concept, but the comic had room to explore it a lot further than it did in this issue.  And dont tell me about it being a first issue, you guys said yourselves that every issue should count.  

Every character was a flat stereotype.  I&#039;m not saying it needs to be faulkner, but it needs ot be more than what it is.  

Bring it on...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eye of the camera gets a c, but Haunted Tank gets an A.</p>
<p>This very interesting, because I would have given EotC at least a B.  I think your reaction has to do with your preconception that only Ross could do this.  I think you should take another look and judge this book on its own merits.  </p>
<p>Now Haunted Tank, I don&#8217;t get it.  Maybe im the crazy one, but it was just a concept.  It was a neat concept, but the comic had room to explore it a lot further than it did in this issue.  And dont tell me about it being a first issue, you guys said yourselves that every issue should count.  </p>
<p>Every character was a flat stereotype.  I&#8217;m not saying it needs to be faulkner, but it needs ot be more than what it is.  </p>
<p>Bring it on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

