<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazing Spider-Man # 582</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/01/09/amazing-spider-man-582/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/01/09/amazing-spider-man-582/</link>
	<description>Weekly Comic Book Review is an online magazine dedicated to providing readers comic book and graphic novel reviews, and commentary on the comic book culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob G</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/01/09/amazing-spider-man-582/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=3908#comment-2085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Tony!

Not sure if Dan Slott would be laughing.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tony!</p>
<p>Not sure if Dan Slott would be laughing&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob G</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/01/09/amazing-spider-man-582/#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=3908#comment-2084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Greg-- Thanks for your comments and your challenges.

I have a confession to make: I haven&#039;t read the &quot;One More Day&quot; or &quot;Brand New Day&quot; arcs. I came back to this series on the &quot;New Ways To Die&quot; arc. I have recently invested in buying all the TPB&#039;s of MJS&#039;s run to catch up and see what all the hoopala surrounding the BND change.

That being said, just coming clean to this series, I find the supporting cast to be horrendous. Every time one of them opens their mouth the comic flat-lines. I think they all need to be reworked and weeded out to make their roles more conducive to the stories.

As far as your comment about McKone&#039;s art--I didn&#039;t feel it was enough to salvage it from the pits. For me, art alone never saves a comic. 

Regarding the secret identity thing, I hate it when it is done cheaply in all comics with any hero. It grinds me more with Spider-Man because Peter is supposed to be a genius and the switching of identities makes for a cool oppurtunity to show off his wits. I detested the lame excuses in the 90&#039;s when I read this book habitually, so my critique is not localized to BND.

I can tell that you are passionate/defensive about this series. Right on! I hope you&#039;ll continue to read our site and share your opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Greg&#8211; Thanks for your comments and your challenges.</p>
<p>I have a confession to make: I haven&#8217;t read the &#8220;One More Day&#8221; or &#8220;Brand New Day&#8221; arcs. I came back to this series on the &#8220;New Ways To Die&#8221; arc. I have recently invested in buying all the TPB&#8217;s of MJS&#8217;s run to catch up and see what all the hoopala surrounding the BND change.</p>
<p>That being said, just coming clean to this series, I find the supporting cast to be horrendous. Every time one of them opens their mouth the comic flat-lines. I think they all need to be reworked and weeded out to make their roles more conducive to the stories.</p>
<p>As far as your comment about McKone&#8217;s art&#8211;I didn&#8217;t feel it was enough to salvage it from the pits. For me, art alone never saves a comic. </p>
<p>Regarding the secret identity thing, I hate it when it is done cheaply in all comics with any hero. It grinds me more with Spider-Man because Peter is supposed to be a genius and the switching of identities makes for a cool oppurtunity to show off his wits. I detested the lame excuses in the 90&#8242;s when I read this book habitually, so my critique is not localized to BND.</p>
<p>I can tell that you are passionate/defensive about this series. Right on! I hope you&#8217;ll continue to read our site and share your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/01/09/amazing-spider-man-582/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=3908#comment-2083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Let me preface by saying, I’m not a &#039;Brand New Day hater.&#039; ...&quot;

&quot;It’s becoming a rule of thumb that any issue that involves the new supporting cast warrants grabbing any other comic off the rack.&quot;

Nice try.  This might sound like a bad Jeff Foxworthy joke but...

If you have a &#039;rule of thumb&#039; to skip issues with the &#039;new supporting cast&#039;, you may be a &#039;Brand New Day hater.&#039;

If you give an &#039;F-&#039; to a book and don&#039;t even give it points for its good Mike McKone art, you may be a &#039;Brand New Day hater.&#039;

If you say Spidey &#039;brain trust&#039; with snark, you may be a &#039;Brand New Day hater.&#039;

But the most obvious sign?

If you complain about people not being able to figure out Spider-Man&#039;s secret identity, even when the clues are right in front of them, even though it&#039;s happened in the new book multiple times, they&#039;ve alluded to it being part of a bigger mystery, AND they&#039;ve drawn attention to it every time it&#039;s happened...  you are obviously a &#039;Brand New Day hater.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let me preface by saying, I’m not a &#8216;Brand New Day hater.&#8217; &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s becoming a rule of thumb that any issue that involves the new supporting cast warrants grabbing any other comic off the rack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nice try.  This might sound like a bad Jeff Foxworthy joke but&#8230;</p>
<p>If you have a &#8216;rule of thumb&#8217; to skip issues with the &#8216;new supporting cast&#8217;, you may be a &#8216;Brand New Day hater.&#8217;</p>
<p>If you give an &#8216;F-&#8217; to a book and don&#8217;t even give it points for its good Mike McKone art, you may be a &#8216;Brand New Day hater.&#8217;</p>
<p>If you say Spidey &#8216;brain trust&#8217; with snark, you may be a &#8216;Brand New Day hater.&#8217;</p>
<p>But the most obvious sign?</p>
<p>If you complain about people not being able to figure out Spider-Man&#8217;s secret identity, even when the clues are right in front of them, even though it&#8217;s happened in the new book multiple times, they&#8217;ve alluded to it being part of a bigger mystery, AND they&#8217;ve drawn attention to it every time it&#8217;s happened&#8230;  you are obviously a &#8216;Brand New Day hater.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/01/09/amazing-spider-man-582/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=3908#comment-2079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL I just read your &quot;What&#039;s Good&quot; portion of this review and almost bust a gut, I was laughing so hard.

Well done, sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL I just read your &#8220;What&#8217;s Good&#8221; portion of this review and almost bust a gut, I was laughing so hard.</p>
<p>Well done, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

