Comments on: Vengeance Of The Moon Knight #3 – Review http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/11/12/vengeance-of-the-moon-knight-3/ Weekly Comic Book Review is an online magazine dedicated to providing readers comic book and graphic novel reviews, and commentary on the comic book culture. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:42:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: joelopez101 http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/11/12/vengeance-of-the-moon-knight-3/#comment-3652 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:24:34 +0000 http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=8464#comment-3652 You know, it honestly comes down to the creative team on this book. I highly suspect that if they weren’t responsible for this, I’d take a pass. They’re doing good comics. I totally agree with your opinion about the character’s redundancy. Moon Knight has always been a title for me that was only ever purchased because Spidey or the Hobgoblin showed up. The more I consider it, I can also think of two more reasons. 1. It’s Batman in the Marvel Universe, and I grew up on Marvel. 2. It’s one of the best “Batman” titles on the stands at the moment. While there are the obvious stand-outs (Detective Comics) and the always interesting (Batman and Robin), the Bat-family as a whole hasn’t been blowing me away recently. While I find the general direction of the line at least entertaining, I’d really be excited to see this team on a Batbook. Until then, I guess I’ll make do with Moon Knight. Thanks.

]]> By: DS Arsenault http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/2009/11/12/vengeance-of-the-moon-knight-3/#comment-3649 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:14:29 +0000 http://weeklycomicbookreview.com/?p=8464#comment-3649 Interesting angle for your review, Joe. In the end, what is it that makes you buy this book, instead of a Bat-title? For myself, I’ve always found him a bit redundant, as if he’s trying to fill a niche that was already fortified by more senior franchises like Daredevil and Batman.

DS

]]>